Begging the question fallacy. Sorry, your argument’s dead in the water before you even start.

Better luck next time.

A “Yes, I believe that Huntington’s Corea is a real disease” or a “No, I do not believe that Huntington’s Corea is a real disease” will suffice.

The beauty of evolution is its simplicity. Think of it in terms of baby-steps, millions (or billions) of them. If a particular cell has a tiny variation that makes it that tiny bit better at surviving, then that particular change becomes dominant, eventually.

An excellent example is the eye: the original version was a cell that could distinguish a little between light and dark; a better cell, that allowed the animal to better run away from danger reacted to shadows; by tiny steps we get to the current versions of the eye. The eagle has a pretty good eye, while ours isn’t great, although apparently much better than those of dogs (who only see black & white). Of course, the eye isn’t perfect, given it’s propensity to short- or long-sightedness, but perhaps in another few million years it’ll be stronger.

This is the only part of the whole article that is in error I am thinking a fundy added it to a peer reviewed article to show what he considered evidence against evolution .
” There is no evidence that the complex information coding for penicillinase production arose by mutation. ”
The evidence arises from considering that these bacteria did in fact live in close proximity to penicillin strains and therefore developed this defense mechanism to survive . Also many other forms of bacteria are developing this same mechanism and becoming resistant to antibiotics these days .